0
Clinical Investigations: OXYGENATION |

Oximeter Performance*: The Influence of Acquisition Parameters

David G. Davila, MD, FCCP; Kathy C. Richards, PhD; Buddy L. Marshall, RPSGT; Patricia S. O’Sullivan, EdD; Ty G. Gregory, RPSGT; Valerie J. Hernandez, RPSGT; Shirley I. Rice, RPSGT
Author and Funding Information

*From the Sleep Disorders Center (Dr. Davila, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Gregory, Ms. Hernandez and Ms. Rice), Baptist Health-Medical Center-Little Rock; and College of Nursing (Dr. Richards), and Office of Educational Development (Dr. O’Sullivan), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR.

Correspondence to: David G. Davila, MD, FCCP, Baptist Health-Medical Center-Little Rock, Sleep Disorders Center, 9601 I-630, Exit 7, Little Rock, AR 72205-7299; e-mail: dgdavila@baptist-health.org



Chest. 2002;122(5):1654-1660. doi:10.1378/chest.122.5.1654
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objective: This study was designed to determine whether different desaturation indexes (DIs) would be obtained in patients with sleep-disordered breathing by systematically altering two acquisition parameters: the recording setting and the display mode.

Design: Prospective clinical study.

Setting: Community sleep-disorders center.

Patients: The study included 75 patients who were suspected of having sleep-disordered breathing.

Interventions: Each patient had simultaneous pulse oxyhemoglobin saturation (Spo2) traces at three recording settings (3 s, 6 s, and 12 s) during the diagnostic phase of split-night polysomnography. On-line and memory displays of those data at each recording setting were obtained. DIs for ≥ 3% desaturation events per hour were calculated for each of the six traces.

Results: The mean on-line DIs significantly differed from each other, with slower (longer) recording settings resulting in lower values than faster (shorter) settings. The memory DIs all significantly underestimated the on-line DIs. Pearson correlations ranged from 0.82 to 0.90 between the on-line/memory DI pairs, but Bland-Altman analysis detected disagreement at higher levels of disordered breathing.

Conclusions: These findings confirm that significantly different Spo2 data are obtained at various acquisition options. The recording setting and display mode parameters should be disclosed in all reports employing oximetry with the fastest recording setting and on-line display mode preferable for case finding of sleep-disordered breathing.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543