0
Clinical Investigations: PULMONARY EMBOLISM |

Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism*: Comparison of the Diagnostic Capabilities of Conventional Film-Screen and Digital Angiography

Tony P. Smith, MD; J. Mark Ryan, MD; Brian K. Brodwater, MD
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: *From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.,  Currently at New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Correspondence to: Tony P. Smith, MD, Department of Radiology, Room 1502, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: smith146@mc.duke.edu



Chest. 2002;122(3):968-972. doi:10.1378/chest.122.3.968
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objective: To compare digital to conventional film-screen pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in a clinical population.

Design: Retrospective review of patient data, ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) lung scintigraphy reports, and pulmonary angiographic reports.

Setting: University hospital, division of interventional radiology.

Patients and methods: Patient data from 307 film-screen and 266 digital angiograms were analyzed for demographics, V̇/Q̇ lung scintigraphy findings, and pulmonary artery pressures to define patient populations. The interpretations of film-screen pulmonary angiography were then compared with digital angiography interpretations for the entire group of interventional radiologists as well as the two interventionists who practiced throughout the study interval to determine any difference in rates of diagnosis of acute PE between the two techniques.

Results: There was no significant difference between the patient populations studied by film-screen or digital techniques for the data reviewed. Digital angiography utilized significantly more contrast material (digital, 173 mL; film-screen, 145 mL; p < 0.01) and a greater number of angiographic views (digital, 3.6 views per patient; film-screen, 3.4 views per patient; p = 0.04) when compared with film-screen angiography. There was no difference between the two techniques in the rates of diagnosis of acute PE, for individual radiologists or overall.

Conclusions: Digital and film-screen pulmonary angiography possess equivalent diagnostic capabilities for acute PE as used in a clinical setting.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543