0
Clinical Investigations: VENTILATORS |

Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Conventional Oxygen Supplementation in Hypoxemic Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Bronchoscopy*

Massimo Antonelli, MD; Giorgio Conti, MD; Monica Rocco, MD; Andrea Arcangeli, MD; Franco Cavaliere, MD; Rodolfo Proietti, MD; Gianfranco Umberto Meduri, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione (Drs. Antonelli, Conti, Arcangeli, Cavaliere, and Proietti), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Università La Sapienza (Dr. Rocco), Rome, Italy; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Meduri), Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN.

Correspondence to: Massimo Antonelli, MD, Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; e-mail: max.antonelli@flashnet.it or m.antonelli@rm.unicatt.it



Chest. 2002;121(4):1149-1154. doi:10.1378/chest.121.4.1149
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective: We have reported previously on the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) to assist spontaneous breathing in high-risk hypoxemic patients (ie, Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen [Fio2] ratio, ≤ 100) who are undergoing diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). The efficacy of this intervention in patients with less severe forms of hypoxemia (ie, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, < 200) is unknown.

Patients and methods: Twenty-six patients with Pao2/Fio2 ratios ≤ 200 who required bronchoscopic BAL for suspected nosocomial pneumonia were entered into the study. Thirteen patients were randomized during FOB to receive NPPV, and 13 patients were randomized to receive conventional oxygen supplementation by Venturi mask. The primary end points were changes in the Pao2/Fio2 ratio during FOB and within 60 min of terminating the procedure.

Results and outcome: At study entry, the two groups were similar in terms of age, simplified acute physiologic score II values, and cardiorespiratory parameters. During FOB, the mean (± SD) Pao2/Fio2 ratio increased by 82% in the NPPV group (261 ± 100 vs 139 ± 38; p < 0.001) and decreased by 10% in the conventional oxygen supplementation group (155 ± 24 to 139 ± 38; p = 0.23). Sixty minutes after undergoing FOB, the NPPV group had a higher mean Pao2/Fio2 ratio (176 ± 62 vs 140 ± 38; p = 0.09), a lower mean heart rate (91 ± 18 vs 108 ± 15 beats/min; p = 0.02), and no reduction in mean arterial pressure in comparison to a 15% decrease from the baseline in the control group. One patient in the NPPV group and two patients in the control group required nonemergent intubation. Major bacterial isolates included Staphylococcus aureus (7 of 30 isolates; 23%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12 of 30 isolates; 40%).

Conclusion: In patients with severe hypoxemia, NPPV is superior to conventional oxygen supplementation in preventing gas-exchange deterioration during FOB with better hemodynamic tolerance.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543