0
Clinical Investigations: EXERCISE |

Comparison of the Peak Exercise Response Measured by the Ramp and 1-min Step Cycle Exercise Protocols in Patients With Exertional Dyspnea*

Sue M. Revill, PhD; Katy E. Beck, BSc; Mike D. L. Morgan, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From the Department of Respiratory Medicine (Drs. Revill and Morgan), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester; and Department of Life Sciences (Ms. Beck), Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

Correspondence to: Sue M. Revill, PhD, Medical Unit, Kings Mill Center, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL, United Kingdom



Chest. 2002;121(4):1099-1105. doi:10.1378/chest.121.4.1099
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objectives: To compare the peak exercise response and determine the limits of agreement between the ramp and the 1-min step cycle protocols in a representative population of patients with exertional breathlessness attending a respiratory outpatient clinic.

Design: Crossover with the test order double blinded and randomized.

Setting: Outpatient exercise physiology laboratory.

Patients: Twenty-two patients (12 men; mean [SD] age, 59 [8] years; FEV1, 71% [21%]) with lung disease and/or exertional breathlessness.

Intervention: Symptom-limited, maximum cycle exercise tests using a ramp and a 1-min step work rate (WR) protocols. The two protocols were assigned to subjects in a randomized manner.

Measurements and results: Oxygen uptake (V̇o2), minute ventilation (V̇e), heart rate (HR), WR, exercise time, and Borg scores were compared at symptom-limited peak exercise. The mean (SD) peak values for the ramp and the step protocols, respectively, were as follows: peak V̇o2, 1.51 (0.44) L/min and 1.49 (0.43) L/min; peak V̇e, 50.8 (12.9) L/min and 49.9 (14.5) L/min; and peak HR, 133 (24) beats/min and 131 (22) beats/min (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between breathlessness and perceived exertion at peak exercise. Peak WR (WRpeak) and exercise time were significantly higher using the ramp protocol: 110.5 (37.1) W vs 105.6 (35.6) W, and 8.2 (2.0) min vs 7.6 (1.9) min, respectively.

Conclusions: The ramp protocol leads to a higher WRpeak, and this may have implications for exercise prescription. However, there were no significant differences between the two protocols for the peak physiologic responses. The choice of protocol for the measurement of maximal exercise capacity remains one of laboratory preference.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543