0
Clinical Investigations: COPD |

Use of a Mucus Clearance Device Enhances the Bronchodilator Response in Patients With Stable COPD*

Norman Wolkove, MD, FCCP; Hany Kamel, MD; Michael Rotaple, MD; Marc A. Baltzan, Jr., MD
Author and Funding Information

*From the Mount Sinai Hospital Center, Montreal, PQ, Canada.

Correspondence to: Norman Wolkove, MD, FCCP, Mount Sinai Hospital Center, 5690 Cavendish Blvd, Cote St. Luc, PQ, H4W 1S7



Chest. 2002;121(3):702-707. doi:10.1378/chest.121.3.702
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objective: To determine whether the use of a mucus clearance device (MCD) [Flutter; Axcan Scandipharm; Birmingham, AL] could improve the bronchodilator response to inhaled ipratropium and salbutamol delivered by a metered-dose inhaler in patients with stable, severe COPD.

Patients: Twenty-three patients with severe COPD were studied. Mean ± SD age was 71.7 ± 6.3 years. Mean FEV1 was 0.74 ± 0.28 L or 34.5 ± 12.7% predicted.

Methods: Patients were tested in random order on 2 subsequent days after using an MCD or a sham MCD. A bronchodilator (four puffs; each puff delivering 20 μg of ipratropium bromide and 120 μg of salbutamol sulfate) was administered by metered-dose inhaler with a holding chamber after use of the MCD or sham MCD. Spirometry was performed before and after use of the MCD or sham MCD, and at 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min after the bronchodilator. Six-minute walk distance was tested between 30 min and 60 min; oxygen saturation, pulse, and a dyspnea score were recorded before and after walking.

Results: Immediately after use of the MCD, but not the sham MCD, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in FEV1 and FVC (11 ± 24% vs 1 ± 7% and 18 ± 33% vs 6 ± 18%, respectively). Whether patients were pretreated with the MCD or sham MCD, there was a significant improvement in FEV1 and FVC compared to baseline with combined bronchodilator therapy. At 120 min, the change in FEV1 after treatment with the MCD was greater than with the sham MCD (186 ± 110 mL vs 130 ± 120 mL; p < 0.05). When comparing the MCD to the sham MCD, 6-min walk distance was greater (174 ± 92 m vs 162 ± 86 m; p < 0.05), with less dyspnea before and at the end of walking.

Conclusion: Patients with severe COPD may demonstrate a significant bronchodilator response to combined ipratropium and salbutamol delivered by metered-dose inhaler. This response may be enhanced and additional functional improvement obtained with the prior use of a bronchial MCD.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543