0
Clinical Investigations: COPD |

Distribution of Lung Density and Mass in Patients With Emphysema as Assessed by Quantitative Analysis of CT*

Mamadou Hawa Hann Diallo, MD; Hervé Guénard, MD; François Laurent, MD; Pierre Carles, MD, FCCP; Jacques Giron, MD
Author and Funding Information

*From the Laboratoire de Physiologie (Drs. Diallo and Guénard), Service D’Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France; the Service de Radiologie (Dr. Laurent), University of Bordeaux II, Bordeaux, France; and the Service de Pneumologie (Dr. Carles) et Radiologie (Dr. Giron), University of Toulouse, France.

Correspondence to: Hervé Guénard, MD, Service d’Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire et Laboratoire de Physiologie, 146 Rue Léo-Saignat, 33760 Bordeaux Cedex, France; e-mail: herve.guenard@labphysio.u-bordeaux2.fr



Chest. 2000;118(6):1566-1575. doi:10.1378/chest.118.6.1566
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Study objective: To assess the effects of emphysema on the apex-to-base gradient of lung density (D) and lung mass (M) and to explore the relationship between M and lung function.

Methods: CT scans of whole lungs were performed in 12 healthy subjects and 29 patients who were breathing at functional residual capacity, after which lung function tests were performed. Whole D and M and regional D (RLD) and M (RLM) were calculated. The degree of emphysema was scored.

Results: The RLM for each height did not differ significantly between patients with disease and healthy subjects, while RLD was significantly lower in the patients with disease. A less marked nonlinear, increasing, craniocaudal gradient of D was observed in the group with disease, suggesting that the distension increases progressively from the apex to the base. RLD and RLM in the 40 to 90% lung height differed significantly among patients in the emphysema group with normal, high, and low M compared to the healthy subjects. M did not differ significantly between patients with centrilobular and panlobular emphysema, which was thought to stem from the marked variations in the results. Vital capacity was lower in the patients with low M.

Conclusions: The lower RLD in the group with low M was due to both lung overinflation and to tissue loss, while in the groups with high or normal M, it was due only to lung overinflation.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543