0
Articles |

The Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement in Detecting the `Gallop Sounds' by Cardiac Auscultation FREE TO VIEW

Charmaine E. Lok; Christopher D. Morgan; Narasimhan Ranganathan
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,  From the Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,  From the Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Science Centre, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Charmaine E. Lok, MD, Department of Medicine, Suite BW1-641, 585 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada; e-mail: c.lok@utoronto.ca


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;114(5):1283-1288. doi:10.1378/chest.114.5.1283
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Study objectives: To determine the observer accuracy and interobserver agreement in identifying S4 and S3 by cardiac auscultation and whether they improve with increasing observer experience.

Design: Prospective, blinded study.

Setting: Cardiology and general internal medicine wards in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Patients: Forty patients with a cardiac diagnosis and 6 patients without were studied.

Measurements and results: Two cardiologists, one general internist, three senior and two junior postgraduate internal medicine trainees, blinded to the patients' characteristics, examined the patients and documented their findings on a questionnaire. Computerized phonocardiogram was obtained in all patients as a gold standard and was interpreted by a blinded, independent cardiologist. The mean positive predictive values for S4 and S3 were 51% (range, 24 to 100%) and 71% (range, 50 to 88%), respectively. The mean negative predictive values for S4 and S3 were 82% (range, 67 to 94%) and 64% (range, 56 to 85%), respectively. The overall interobserver agreements for detecting S4 was K = 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.09) and S3 was K = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24). There was no apparent trend in the accuracy or interobserver agreement with regard to the level of observer experience.

Conclusion: The agreement between observers and the phonocardiographic gold standard in the correct identification of S4 and S3 was poor and the lack of agreement did not appear to be a function of the experience of the observers. The overall interobserver agreement for the detection of either S4 or S3 was little better than chance alone.


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543