Articles |

The Effect of Exercise on Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation FREE TO VIEW

Jesús Peteiro; Evaristo Freire; Lorenzo Montserrat; Alfonso Castro-Beiras
Author and Funding Information

From the Department of Cardiology, Juan Canalejo Hospital, A Coruña, Spain

Jesus Peteiro, MD, P/Ronda,5-4°izda, 15011, A Coruña, Spain

1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1998;114(4):1075-1082. doi:10.1378/chest.114.4.1075
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This study investigated the effect of dynamic exercise on mitral regurgitation (MR) as assessed by color flow Doppler imaging and tested the hypothesis that MR increases in patients with left ventricular (LV) function worsening during exercise. We studied 513 patients (390 men, 123 women:mean age [±1 SD] 58±11 years) referred for treadmill exercise echocardiography (EE) to evaluate known or suspected coronary artery disease. Normal EE was seen in 182 (36%), necrosis in 131 (25%), and ischemic response (with or without necrosis) in 200 (39%). MR assessment was performed at rest and immediately postexercise, on the basis of the mosaic area. At rest, mild MR (< 3 cm2) was seen in 138; moderate (3 to 6 cm2) was seen in 21; and severe (> 6 cm2) was seen in 5. Forty-two patients developed new, mild (n=35), moderate (n=6), or severe (n=1) MR during exercise. Patients were assigned to three groups: group 1-new or increased MR from rest to exercise (n=70); group 2-MR at rest unchanged or decreased (n=136); and group 3-no MR at rest and exercise (n=307). At rest, LV ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion score index (WMSI) were similar in group 1 and group 2 but improved in group 3 (EF: group 1, 51±11%; group 2, 53±10%; group 3, 56±8%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.3±0.3; group 2, 1.3±0.4; group 3, 1.1±0.2, p<0.01 vs group 1, p<0.001 vs group 2). At exercise, EF and WMSI were impaired in group 1 (EF: group 1, 52±14%; group 2, 58±15%; group 3, 64±11%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2; p<0.05 between group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.5±0.4; group 2, 1.4±0.4; group 3, 1.2±0.3, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2, p<0.05 between group 1 and group 2). An ischemic response was common in group 1 (67% vs 35% in group 2 and 34% in group 3, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3 and between group 1 and group 2). Accordingly, in group 1 patients, exercise time was diminished (7.3±2.7 vs 8.4±2.7 in group 2 and 9.3±2.4 in group 3, p<0.01, between group 1 and group 2, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3, p<0.001 between group 2 and group 3) and the number of severely narrowed coronary vessels greater (2.4±0.9 vs 1.7±1.0 in group 2 and 1.7±1.0 in group 3). In conclusion, MR does not increase in most patients submitted to dynamic exercise echocardiography. However, if MR develops, severe LV function worsening should be suspected.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543