Articles |

Correction of Single-Breath Helium Lung Volumes in Patients With Airflow Obstruction FREE TO VIEW

Naresh M. Punjabi; David Shade; Robert A. Wise
Author and Funding Information

From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore MD.

Robert A. Wise, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD, 21124

1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1998;114(3):907-918. doi:10.1378/chest.114.3.907
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Study objective: To determine whether alveolar volume (VA) measured during the single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DCO) can be used as a substitute measure for the multiple-breath total lung capacity (TLC) in subjects with and without airways obstruction.

Design: Retrospective review of pulmonary function test (PFT) results.

Setting: Pulmonary function laboratories at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and the Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center (JHAAC).

Participants: Patients referred for spirometry, helium lung volumes, and DCO during a single visit between November 1993 and November 1996.

Results: JHAAC patients (n=2,477) were used to assess the relationship between VA and TLC. In patients with an FEV1/FVC ≥0.70, there was good agreement between VA and TLC (VA/TLC=0.97 to 0.99). However, in patients with an FEV1/FVC <0.70, VA systematically underestimated TLC (VA/TLC=0.67 to 0.94). The degree of underestimation was related to the severity of airflow obstruction. To predict TLC using VA, a regression equation was used to "correct" VA for the severity of obstruction. This equation was used to predict the multiple-breath TLC for JHH patients (n=2,892). Patients with an FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 showed a high degree of correlation between VA and TLC (Pearson's correlation coefficient [r]=0.96 to 0.99; p<0.05). After adjusting for the severity of airflow obstruction, patients with an FEV1/FVC in the range of 0.40 to 0.70 also had a strong correlation between the corrected VA and the multiple-breath TLC (r=0.83 to 0.94; p<0.05).

Conclusions: VA accurately predicts TLC in patients with mild or no airflow obstruction. For patients with moderate to severe obstruction, correcting VA for the severity of obstruction improves the accuracy of this relatively simple and rapid technique for measuring TLC.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543