0
Articles |

Intrathoracic and Extrathoracic Sources of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Porcine Endotoxemic Shock

Yoshitaka Fujii; Peter Goldberg; Sabah N.A. Hussain
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,  From the Critical Care and Respiratory Divisions, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Sabah Hussain, MD, Room L3.05, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Ave. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;114(2):569-576. doi:10.1378/chest.114.2.569
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Objectives: Nitric oxide (NO), a highly reactive species produced by the activity of NO synthases (NOS), is normally present in the exhaled air of humans and animals. Exhaled NO concentration increases significantly in humans with sepsis and animals, but neither the source nor NOS isoforms responsible for this rise in pulmonary NO production are known. The main objective of this study is to determine the sites and the mechanisms of enhanced NO production in the exhaled air of endotoxemic pigs.

Design: Randomized, controlled, animal study.

Setting: University-based animal research facility.

Subjects: Thirteen pathogen-free adult female pigs (22 to 27 kg).

Interventions: Anesthetized pigs were divided into two groups: control and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (septic) groups. In both groups, extrathoracic (upper airways, nasal, and paranasal) and intrathoracic (bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli) compartments were ventilated equally with two separate ventilators connected to two tracheal tubes. The LPS group received slow infusion (over 2 h) of Escherichia coli endotoxin (10 µg/kg/h), whereas saline solution was infused into the control group. Expired air of the two compartments was collected throughout the 2-h observation period. The animals were then killed and the lungs were quickly excised and frozen.

Measurements: Hemodynamic variables were measured in both groups. NO concentration in the exhaled air of both compartments was measured with a chemiluminescence analyser. Pulmonary NOS activity was evaluated by measuring the conversion of L-[2,3H]-arginine to L-[2,3H]-citrulline, and pulmonary expression of NOS was evaluated by immunoblotting.

Results: Baseline NO concentration in both groups was significantly higher in the extrathoracic vs intrathoracic compartment (average of 5.2 vs 3.4 parts per billion). Endotoxin infusion elicited a significant and early (after 45 min) rise in exhaled NO concentration in the extrathoracic compartment. Exhaled NO in the intrathoracic compartment also rose significantly but after 90 min of endotoxin infusion. Measurement of lung NOS activity showed a substantial rise in Ca++/calmodulin-dependent activity in the LPS group with no rise in Ca++/calmodulin-independent activity. Immunoblotting of lung tissue samples indicated the absence of the inducible isoform in both groups of animals. Moreover, LPS injection elicited no significant alterations in the pulmonary expression of the endothelial and the neuronal isoforms.

Conclusions: Both extrathoracic and intrathoracic compartments contribute to the rise in exhaled NO production in experimental septic shock. The rise in exhaled NO production is due to increased activity of constitutive NOS isoforms as a result of increased cofactor availability and/or downregulation of the endogenous inhibitors of NOS.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543