Articles |

The Value of Routine Posttracheostomy Chest Radiography FREE TO VIEW

Michael Tarnoff; Michael Moncure; Felician Jones; Steven Ross; Martin Goodman
Author and Funding Information

From the Department of Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, NJ.

1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1998;113(6):1647-1649. doi:10.1378/chest.113.6.1647
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Objective: This study proposes to evaluate the efficacy of routine posttracheostomy chest radiography.

Design: A retrospective chart review provided the framework of this study.

Setting: The study took place at a university teaching hospital-level one trauma center.

Patients: The study included 293 patients undergoing elective tracheostomy between 1989 and 1993.

Measurements and results: Data extracted from the charts included indication for tracheostomy, immediate preoperative and postoperative chest radiograph reports, management changes made secondarily to radiographic findings, including chest tube placement, institution of chest physiotherapy, and need for tracheal tube reposition. Complications were defined as findings not noted on the preoperative radiographs; these were pneumothorax, tube malposition, atelectasis, or clinical information resulting in management changes. All patients received postoperative chest radiographs in the trauma ICU. Statistical analysis of our data was carried out using the χ2 test. Patients with chest tubes in place at the time of surgery were the only group who were excluded so as not to confuse whether pneumothorax developed postoperatively. Of the initial 293 patients, 25 patients were excluded on the basis of having a chest tube. The remaining 268 charts were analyzed; 220 (82%) patients underwent tracheostomy for ventilator-dependent respiratory failure, 31 (12%) due to multiple facial fractures, 6 (2.1%) secondary to penetrating neck wounds, and 11 (4%) as a result of refractory vocal cord edema. One (0.3%) patient was found to have a postoperative 10% apical pneumothorax. Eight (2.4%) patients were found to have postoperative subsegmental atelectasis. There were no significant (p>0.05) management changes implemented as a result of these findings. No new infiltrates, effusions, or malpositioned tubes were noted. Deletion of routine posttracheostomy radiographs would save $52.39 per patient (cost) or $15,350 for 293 patients and $35,453 in total patient charges.

Conclusions: Abnormalities revealed by routine chest radiography after tracheostomy did not appear to alter patient management frequently enough to warrant the costs. A randomized, prospective study should be performed to analyze the safety of abandoning this practice.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Catamenial pneumothorax: A case report. J Pak Med Assoc 2016;66(10):1327-1329.
Normal postoperative appearances of lung cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging Published online Sep 26, 2016;
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543