0
Articles |

Additional Information From Percutaneous Cutting Needle Biopsy Following Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Chest Lesions

Alexander N. Staroselsky; Yehuda Schwarz; Abraham Man; Silvia Marmur; Joel Greif
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel,  From the Department of Pathology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Affiliations: From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel,  From the Department of Pathology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;113(6):1522-1525. doi:10.1378/chest.113.6.1522
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Objective: To determine the contribution of percutaneous cutting needle biopsy (PNB) subsequent to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of chest lesions.

Design: A retrospective review of 220 patients who underwent CT-guided FNA followed immediately by PNB performed at our center between 1988 and 1995 was undertaken. Thirty-eight patients were excluded because FNA and/or PNB specimens were nondiagnostic, yielding a study group of 182 patients.

Results: A diagnosis of malignancy was made in 141 (77.5%) and nonmalignancy in 41 (22.5%) cases. The yield of histospecific diagnosis due to FNA was marginally higher than PNB in malignant lesions (86.5% vs 78%, respectively). In contrast, PNB was superior to FNA for the histospecific diagnosis of benign lesions (87.8% for PNB vs 31.7% for FNA, p<0.00001) and lymphomas (88% for PNB vs 56% for FNA, p<0.05). In 58.8% of the patients with benign lesions and in 37.5% of the patients with lymphoma, PNB performances altered clinical management, either by avoiding further surgery or allowing specific medical treatment. Pneumothorax occurred in 24.7% of the cases but only five patients (2.7%) required hospitalization.

Conclusion: PNB is extremely effective for making a specific diagnosis in benign lesions compared with FNA. PNB does not increase the yield of histospecific diagnosis for malignant lesions except for the subset of lymphoma, where it seems to provide important additional information in many instances. We recommend that FNA be performed as the initial procedure, followed by PNB in cases of equivocal diagnosis of carcinoma, for lymphoma and for suspected benign lesions.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
Guidelines
Renal cell carcinoma.
Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres | 9/25/2009
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543