0
Articles |

Comparison of Short-term Functional Outcomes Following Unilateral and Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Robert M. Kotloff; Gregory Tino; Harold I. Palevsky; John Hansen-Flaschen; Peter M. Wahl; Larry R. Kaiser; Joseph E. Bavaria
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia,  From the Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia

Affiliations: From the Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia,  From the Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;113(4):890-895. doi:10.1378/chest.113.4.890
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Study objectives: To compare short-term functional outcomes following unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performed in patients with advanced emphysema.

Methods: LVRS was performed unilaterally in 32 patients and bilaterally in 119 patients. Pulmonary function testing and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were performed preoperatively and repeated at 3 to 6 months postoperatively.

Results: Bilateral LVRS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (10% vs 0%, p<0.05) and a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory failure (12.6% vs 0%; p<0.05) compared with unilateral LVRS. There was no significant difference in duration of air leaks between unilateral and bilateral groups, but the mean hospital stay was significantly longer following bilateral LVRS (21.1±32.0 days vs 14.2±14.0 days; p<0.05). Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the unilateral and bilateral groups with respect to FEV1, FVC, residual volume, or 6MWT distance. However, for all of these parameters, the magnitude of improvement was significantly greater following bilateral LVRS. Notably, the magnitude of improvement in each parameter following unilateral LVRS exceeded half that following bilateral LVRS, suggesting that functional outcomes after the unilateral procedure were disproportionate to the amount of tissue resected. Serial functional assessment of seven patients undergoing staged unilateral procedures (two unilateral procedures separated in time by at least 3 months) demonstrated somewhat unpredictable responses; failure to achieve a favorable response to the initial procedure did not necessarily portend a similar outcome with the contralateral side, and vise versa.

Conclusions: Bilateral LVRS produces a greater magnitude of short-term functional improvement than does the unilateral procedure and should be considered the procedure of choice for most patients. Unilateral LVRS should be reserved for patients in whom factors contraindicating entrance into one hemithorax exist.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543