0
Articles |

Patterns of Dissimilarities Among Instrument Models in Measuring Po2, Pco2, and pH in Blood Gas Laboratories

James E. Hansen; Richard Casaburi
Author and Funding Information

From the Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif.


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;113(3):780-787. doi:10.1378/chest.113.3.780
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Study objectives: To ascertain the degree of dissimilarities among blood gas and pH analyzer models of the same and different manufacturers in measurement of Po2, Pco2, and pH using fluorocarbon containing emulsion (FCE) proficiency testing material.

Design: Statistically and graphically analyze data from six recent proficiency testing surveys for the 20 more frequently used models of analyzers.

Setting and participants: Over a 2-year period, approximately 900 participants from blood gas laboratories in the United States analyzed similar ampules from each of 30 lots.

Measurements and results: Both graphic and statistical comparisons were used to demonstrate differences between manufacturers. For each of the four major manufacturers, comparisons revealed statistically significant differences not only for Po2, but also for Pco2 and pH. Additionally, comparison models within each of the three manufacturers (those with multiple models and >15 instruments per model represented) disclosed statistically significant dissimilarities among models for each analyte in 115 of 153 model pairings. Previously reported tonometered blood differences among analyzer models for Po2 are qualitatively similar to the differences found in these same models in this FCE study. Model differences are important in research studies and may be clinically important in deciding abnormality, selecting oxygen therapy, or the treatment of patients with respiratory failure or severe respiratory alkalosis.

Conclusions: To minimize the likelihood of misleading clinicians, laboratory directors should consider the degree of dissimilarity among blood gas analyzer models in current use and when changing instrumentation.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543