0
Articles |

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing an Extended-Use Hygroscopic Condenser Humidifier With Heated-Water Humidification in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Marin H. Kollef; Steven D. Shapiro; Vanessa Boyd; Patricia Silver; Benjamin Von Harz; Ellen Trovillion; Donna Prentice
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Washington University School of Medicine, and Departments of Respiratory Therapy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Infection Control, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis

Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Washington University School of Medicine, and Departments of Respiratory Therapy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Infection Control, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis

Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Washington University School of Medicine, and Departments of Respiratory Therapy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Infection Control, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis

Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Washington University School of Medicine, and Departments of Respiratory Therapy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis,  From the Department of Infection Control, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis


1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1998;113(3):759-767. doi:10.1378/chest.113.3.759
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Study objective: To determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of mechanical ventilation with an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier (Duration; Nellcor Puritan-Bennett; Eden Prairie, Minn) compared with mechanical ventilation with heated-water humidification.

Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Medical and surgical ICUs of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Patients: Three hundred ten consecutive qualified patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to receive humidification with either an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier (for up to the first 7 days of mechanical ventilation) or heated-water humidification.

Measurements: Occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, endotracheal tube occlusion, duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of intensive care and hospitalization, acquired multiorgan dysfunction, and hospital mortality.

Results: One hundred sixty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive humidification with an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier, and 147 patients were randomly assigned to receive heated-water humidification. The two groups were similar at the time of randomization with regard to demographic characteristics, ICU admission diagnoses, and severity of illness. Risk factors for the development of ventilator- associated pneumonia were also similar during the study period for both treatment groups. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was seen in 15 (9.2%) patients receiving humidification with an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier and in 15 (10.2%) patients receiving heated-water humidification (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval=0.46 to 1.78; p=0.766). No statistically significant differences for hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay in the hospital or ICU, or acquired organ system derangements were found between the two treatment groups. No episode of endotracheal tube occlusion occurred during the study period in either treatment group. The total cost of providing humidification was $2,605 for patients receiving a hygroscopic condenser humidifier compared with $5,625 for patients receiving heated-water humidification.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the initial application of an extended-use hygroscopic condenser humidifier is a safe and more cost-effective method of providing humidification to patients requiring mechanical Ventilation compared with head-water humidification.


Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

MEMBER & INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIBER

Want Access?

NEW TO CHEST?

Become a CHEST member and receive a FREE subscription as a benefit of membership.

Individuals can purchase this article on ScienceDirect.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal.

Individuals can purchase a subscription to the journal or buy individual articles.

Learn more about membership or Purchase a Full Subscription.

INSTITUTIONAL ACCESS

Institutional access is now available through ScienceDirect and can be purchased at myelsevier.com.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543