Articles |

Use of Conventional and Self-Adjusting Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome : A Comparative Study FREE TO VIEW

Martin Konermann; Bernd M. Sanner; Martin Vyleta; Frank Laschewski; Juergen Groetz; Alexander Sturm; Walter Zidek
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Marienkrankenhaus, Kassel, Germany,  From the Medical Department, University of Bochum, Marienhospital, Herne, Germany

Affiliations: From the Marienkrankenhaus, Kassel, Germany,  From the Medical Department, University of Bochum, Marienhospital, Herne, Germany

1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1998;113(3):714-718. doi:10.1378/chest.113.3.714
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Study objectives: To compare conventional and self-adjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with respect to suppression of respiratory disturbances, quality of sleep, mean mask pressure, and patient compliance.

Design: Cohort study of consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, single-blinded.

Setting: Clinical sleep laboratory in Germany.

Patients: Fifty patients (44 men, 6 women who ranged in age from 35 to 71 years) with polysomnographically confirmed severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (respiratory disturbance index [RDI], >20/h).

Measurements and interventions: After baseline polysomnography, patients were randomly treated with nCPAP either in conventional (group 1) or in automatically adjusting (group 2) mode. Three to 6 months after adjustment, all patients underwent polysomnography again. They also were examined with a portable monitoring device and received a questionnaire on subjective well-being and device evaluation.

Results: Anthropometric and respiratory data were comparable in both groups; body mass index had not changed significantly in the follow-up. RDI dropped by 91.5% (from 38.3±13.9/h to 3.6±4.4/h) in conventional and by 93.6% (from 35.5±9.6/h to 2.4±1.6/h) in self-adjusting mode (statistically not significant [NS]). Sleep efficiency decreased by 4.0% in conventional and increased by 2.0% in self-adjusting mode (NS). In both groups, normal sleep structure was largely restored. Mean mask pressure was 8.1±2.5 cm H2O in group 1 and 6.5±1.7 cm H2O in group 2 (p<0.01). Patient compliance in terms of nights per week of mask appliance was better in the self-adjusting mode (5.7±0.7 to 6.5±0.4; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Self-adjusting nCPAP demonstrates the same reliability in suppression of respiratory disturbances as fixed-mask pressure therapy. Sleep quality is slightly superior, patient compliance is highly significantly better.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
Nasal Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am Published online Oct 6, 2016;
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543