Articles |

Multimodality Treatment of Esophageal Disruptions FREE TO VIEW

Lajos Kotsis; Szilárd Kostic; Kornélia Zubovits
Author and Funding Information

From the Postgraduate Medical University, Thoracic Surgical Clinic, Budapest, Hungary

1997 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1997;112(5):1304-1309. doi:10.1378/chest.112.5.1304
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The treatment of esophageal disruptions has changed since 1981. The value of a more selective assessment in six spontaneous ruptures and 30 mostly intrathoracic (83.4%) esophageal perforations is evaluated in this study. Based on the previous state of the esophagus, the time factor, and type and site of the disruption, reinforced primary repair (by diaphragmatic, muscular, pleural flap, or fundoplication), transhiatal closure, resection, intubation, suture combined with myotomy and fundoplication, esophageal diversion, and transhiatal mediastinal drainage were employed. The overall 30-day hospital mortality was 19.4%. Although these operations were mostly used in late (24 h to 7 months) perforations and ruptures, none of the patients with reinforced repair by autogenous diaphragmatic, muscular, or pleural flaps or fundoplication had fatal outcome for breakdown of the closure. Only patients with renal, cardiac, or multiorgan failure as a consequence of sepsis due to time elapsed before hospital admission died. The key to improve the prognosis of this life-threatening emergency is the more appropriate selection of the primary employed procedure.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543