Articles |

A Short Protocol for Methacholine Provocation Testing Adapted to the Rosenthal-Chai Dosimeter Technique FREE TO VIEW

Rudolf A. Jörres; Dennis Nowak; Detlef Kirsten; Lars Grönke; Helgo Magnussen
Author and Funding Information

From the Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf, Zentrum für Pneumologie und Thoraxchirurgie, Grosshansdorf, Germany

1997 by the American College of Chest Physicians

Chest. 1997;111(4):866-869. doi:10.1378/chest.111.4.866
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a rapid and safe methacholine provocation protocol equivalent to the standard dosimeter technique.

Methods: The rapid protocol comprised a short and a long subprotocol. The challenge was started with one of these subprotocols according to the subject's answers to a questionnaire and baseline lung function. If FEV1 dropped by 10% during the short subprotocol, the test was continued with the long subprotocol. The concentrations of methacholine and numbers of inhalations were chosen to match the concentrations of the standard method as closely as possible. To verify the protocol, we compared both methods in 38 subjects with asthma and 10 control subjects.

Results: The provocative concentrations of methacholine (PC20 FEV1) obtained with the standard method and the rapid method were within one doubling concentration in 38 of 40 subjects. None of the subjects who were normoreactive according to the standard method (PC20FEV1 >8 mg/mL) responded in the rapid protocol. The standard method required, on average (±SD), 34±11 min; the rapid method required 15±3 min.

Conclusions: The rapid provocation protocol is equivalent to the standard method, without loss in precision and safety, but with considerable saving in time. Therefore, it appears to be particularly suited for studies that require comparability with provocative concentrations obtained with the Rosenthal-Chai dosimeter method.




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
Difference Between Dosimeter and Tidal Breathing Methacholine Challenge*: Contributions of Dose and Deep Inspiration Bronchoprotection
Methacholine Challenge*: Comparison of Two Methods
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543