0
Articles |

Assessment of Practical Knowledge of Self-Management of Acute Asthma FREE TO VIEW

John Kolbe; Marina Vamos; Frances James; Gail Elkind; Jeffrey Garrett
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From the Departments of Respiratory Medicine and Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Psychiatry, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand

Affiliations: From the Departments of Respiratory Medicine and Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Psychiatry, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand

Affiliations: From the Departments of Respiratory Medicine and Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Psychiatry, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand,  From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Green Lane Hospital and University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand


1996 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CHEST PHYSICIANS


Chest. 1996;109(1):86-90. doi:10.1378/chest.109.1.86
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Aims: To develop an instrument for the measurement of, and to determine the level of, practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma.

Methods: Eighty patients with moderate/severe asthma attending a hospital-based asthma clinic responded to an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Subjects were asked to describe the action they would take in response to each of two hypothetical evolving attacks: (1) one of gradually increasing severity and (2) the other developing rapidly. Responses were scored according to the appropriateness of actions taken relevant to the stage of the attack. Transcripts of the responses were scored independently by three of the investigators according to a system based on Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and British Thoracic Society (BTS) consensus statements on asthma management. A 25-point scale was used on which 0 represented a total lack of appropriate responses and a score of 25 was an optimal response.

Results: Interrater and intrarater reliability were excellent. Mean (±SD) scores for the slow and rapid onset attacks were 12.8±4.0 and 13.9±4.8, respectively. The scores for the two scenarios were predicted by each other (p=0.002) and by the interviewer's rating of asthma management knowledge (p=0.0004, p=0.0001), but not by age, sex, race, previous asthma morbidity, depression, or anxiety. In both scenarios, most patients indicated that they would increase inhaled β-agonist (85% for slow-onset scenarios and 94% for rapid-onset scenarios, respectively) and use their action plan and/or seek urgent medical advice at an appropriate time (74% and 70%). Although some would measure peak expiratory flow (PEF) initially (54% and 30%), only a minority would continue to monitor PEF in the context of worsening acute asthma (30% and 24%). When a severe life-threatening situation was described, only 50% and 64%, respectively, indicated that they would call emergency services.

Conclusions: Scenarios describing hypothetical asthma attacks are a useful and reproducible method of assessing practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma. Patients presented with scenarios frequently made errors in their hypothetical responses. The errors made with scenarios, which parallel errors reported in real clinical situations, occurred despite the fact that this patient population had received considerable education and training about how to manage asthma. Most indicated they would not monitor PEF even in an exacerbation of asthma and would not call emergency services despite life-threatening asthma. These scenarios may allow us to explore the gap between knowledge about treatment and actual practice, and perhaps to help close that gap and thus reduce asthma morbidity and mortality.


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543