0
Articles |

The Effect of Body Fat Distribution on Pulmonary Function Tests FREE TO VIEW

Lynell C. Collins; Phillip D. Hoberty; Jerome F. Walker; Eugene C. Fletcher; Alan N. Peiris
Author and Funding Information

Affiliations: From Division of Respiratory and Environmental Medicine; University of Louisville School of Medicine and Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Respiratory Therapy; University of Louisville School of Allied Health, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Endocrinology, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University and Mountain Home Veterans Administration Medical Center, Johnson City, Tennessee

Affiliations: From Division of Respiratory and Environmental Medicine; University of Louisville School of Medicine and Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Respiratory Therapy; University of Louisville School of Allied Health, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Endocrinology, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University and Mountain Home Veterans Administration Medical Center, Johnson City, Tennessee

Affiliations: From Division of Respiratory and Environmental Medicine; University of Louisville School of Medicine and Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Respiratory Therapy; University of Louisville School of Allied Health, Louisville, Kentucky,  From Division of Endocrinology, College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University and Mountain Home Veterans Administration Medical Center, Johnson City, Tennessee


1995 by the American College of Chest Physicians


Chest. 1995;107(5):1298-1302. doi:10.1378/chest.107.5.1298
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

Although the influence of obesity on pulmonary function tests has been examined, the role of body fat distribution has received limited attention. Pulmonary studies of patients severely affected by upper body obesity suggest they have more severely compromised lung volumes than obese patients with lower body obesity. We examined 42 healthy but normal or mildly obese men to determine if body fat distribution influences pulmonary function tests.

Multiple measures of adiposity showed a significant inverse relationship with both spirometry and static lung volumes. However, the biceps skinfold thickness had the strongest inverse relationship with total lung capacity (TLC) compared to other anthropometric measures. The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with static lung volumes only when controlling for cigarette smoking. However, comparing pulmonary function tests between patients with a WHR less than 0.950 (lower body fat distribution) and subjects with a WHR of 0.950 or greater (upper body fat distribution revealed that FVC, FEV1, and TLC were significantly lower in the patients with upper body fat distribution. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was done using all anthropometric variables and age which generated predictive equations that included the biceps skinfold thickness for residual volume (RV) and TLC. This suggests that upper body fat distribution may be associated with a modest impairment of lung volumes in normal and mildly obese men. Until the findings of this study can be applied to a larger, ethnically and anthropometrically diverse population, and to women, we believe caution is warranted when standard equations are used to predict pulmonary function tests in an anthropometrically diverse population.


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
CHEST Collections
PubMed Articles
Guidelines
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543