Slide Presentations: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 |

Code Critical Airway Teams Save Lives FREE TO VIEW

Patricia Mccabe, MSN; George Sample, MD
Chest. 2011;140(4_MeetingAbstracts):979A. doi:10.1378/chest.1119049
Text Size: A A A
Published online


PURPOSE: It takes an experienced multi-professional team to handle emergent airway situations. We created a Code Critical Airway team to manage airway emergencies. Critical (difficult) airway emergencies are increasing due to advances in medical treatments, obesity and sleep apnea.

METHODS: Utilizing a complex framework with the goal of successful airway management outcomes, the project was divided into six components: 1) patient safety, includes the development of an airway management plan focused on improved team efficiency and culture change from “Panic Button” to “Bridge to Safety”; 2) patient assessment, includes the development of educational programs focusing on early recognition of potential critical airway patients; 3) teamwork, includes the development of improved communication, paging and handoff processes; 4) performance improvement, includes after-action reviews of each event to assess and address system and process issues; 5) equipment, includes the development of standardized airway equipment at the bedside and 6) team simulation training, includes consistency in communication, handoff, teamwork and equipment use.

RESULTS: The average time to establish an airway across all techniques has been drastically reduced (55 minutes to 22 minutes), noting the dramatic improvement in the time to reintubation (18 minutes to 5 minutes). The number of surgical airways required reduced from 5 pre-project to 0 in Phase Two. Thirty-one percent of the airway patients were obese or had a short thick neck. We have seen an increase in our respiratory distress calls versus respiratory arrest calls, reinforcing the benefit of proactive over reactive calling. Code Critical Airway education programs improved the number of appropriate Code Critical Airways being called, as well as improved overall Code Critical Airway Team response time. As a by-product of this process, reliability of available appropriate airway equipment is now 100%.

CONCLUSIONS: This project made significant process improvements in the areas of patient safety, team communication, equipment availability and response efficiency.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Hospitals should develop a specialized airway team to decrease adverse airway events.

DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Patricia Mccabe, George Sample

No Product/Research Disclosure Information

11:30 AM - 12:45 PM




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543