0
Poster Presentations: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 |

A Comparison of Mortality and Resuscitation Bundle Compliance in a Large, Nonteaching Tertiary Health-care Facility Based on Intensivist Staffing FREE TO VIEW

Donald Maxwell, MMed; Heather Leinbach, PharmD; Cathy Merritt, MHA; Brenda Wynne, RN; Lorry Carrigan, BSN
Author and Funding Information

Banner Desert Medical Center, Mesa, AZ



Chest. 2011;140(4_MeetingAbstracts):419A. doi:10.1378/chest.1083667
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of intensivist staffing on resuscitation bundle compliance and overall sepsis mortality in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS: All septic patients identified using the Surviving Sepsis Campaign severe sepsis / septic shock screening criteria from September 1, 2007 to June 2010 were reviewed for the impact of sepsis presentation time, and intensivist staffing on resuscitation bundle compliance and overall mortality. Data in our Surviving Sepsis Campaign database was extracted to determine bundle compliance, timing of sepsis presentation, and mortality.

RESULTS: Two daytime intensivists (0900-2100) were compared to one nighttime intensivist (2100-0900) regarding resuscitation bundle compliance and mortality. For the day shift, there were n=482 septic patients with an all-or-none resuscitation bundle compliance of 26.55% and a mortality rate of 15.98%. Interestingly, the night shift saw n=246 with a compliance of 32.11% and a mortality rate of 21.54%. Using the Fisher’s exact test, the p-value for bundle compliance was 0.069 between the two groups and the p-value for overall mortality difference between the two groups was p=0.041. Since both resuscitation bundle compliance and overall mortality were higher with the nighttime one intensivist, comparison between those patients who were compliant with the resuscitation bundle and died to those who were non-compliant with the resuscitation bundle and died were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test. 12/116 during the daytime and 15/64 during the nighttime who met all resuscitation bundle elements had died with p-value of 0.039. 65/289 during the daytime and 38/129 at nighttime did not achieve all-or-none resuscitation bundle and died (p=0.145).

CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of differences between two intensivists during the day and one intensivist at night revealed a statistically higher mortality rate of 5.57% despite a higher resuscitation bundle compliance (5.56%) with the night intensivist. Further evaluation revealed compliance with the resuscitation bundle and mortality showed an increase of 8.99% and 3.77% in mortality if non-compliant with the bundle in both day and night shifts covered by intensivists, respectively.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Critical care physician staffing, timing of sepsis admissions, and bundle compliance may all impact the septic patient's overall survival

DISCLOSURE: Donald Maxwell: Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Edwards Lifesciences

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Heather Leinbach, Cathy Merritt, Brenda Wynne, Lorry Carrigan

No Product/Research Disclosure Information

09:00 AM - 10:00 AM


Figures

Tables

References

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
CHEST Journal Articles
PubMed Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543