0
Correspondence |

Response FREE TO VIEW

Helen A. Hawkins, PhD; Craig M. Lilly, MD, FCCP; Robert H. Groves, Jr., MD, FCCP; Hargobind Khurana, MD
Author and Funding Information

FINANCIAL/NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: See earlier cited article for author conflicts of interest.

aSchool of Education, Colorado State University, Worcester, MA

bDepartments of Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

cClinical and Population Health Research Program, Worcester, MA

dGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester, MA

eHealth Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, AZ

fBanner-University Medicine Division, Banner Health, Phoenix, AZ

CORRESPONDENCE TO: Hargobind Khurana, MD, Health Management, Banner Health, 1441 N. 12th St, Phoenix, AZ 85006


Copyright 2017, American College of Chest Physicians. All Rights Reserved.


Chest. 2017;151(4):946-947. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.005
Text Size: A A A
Published online

We thank the authors of “Does Size Matter in ICU Telemedicine?” for the pertinent points made regarding how facility size and heterogeneity of practices may affect ICU telemedicine processes. We are also interested in the factors associated with better outcomes, and leveraged variation of size among our community hospitals in the analyses by Hawkins et al.

  • 1.

    Patient data collection: The harmonized approach to data collection from the eight ICUs of the study by Hawkins et al allowed us to identify comanagement methods as a significant differentiating factor. Hospital size was not predictive. Generally speaking, current electronic systems and integration expertise allow the transfer of data through electronic interfaces and routinely simplify access to many forms of clinical information. Investment in these technologies and the proper training of critical care professionals may have prevented differences of electronic data transfer from being a detectable distinguishing factor for length of stay (LOS) outcomes in the study.

  • 2.

    Authority to intervene: One of the important findings of the study by Hawkins et al is that it provides new information about how alternative approaches under the administrative control of the sponsoring or subscribing institutions affect outcomes and how costs compare in terms of LOS outcomes.

  • 3.

    Collaboration between telemedicine and bedside ICUs: We strongly agree with the authors regarding the importance of collaborative relationships among ICU providers. We also agree that having staff work on both sides of the camera helps to promote these relationships. The use of two-way telemedicine systems that provide frequent communications, and which include patients who have the capacity to participate, is another effective way to form and develop these relationships. We respectfully point out that large comparative studies that included acuity-adjusted outcomes have not identified the size of the ICU telemedicine program or number of supported ICUs as associated with meaningful differences of outcomes. Some studies have noted cost benefits to rural hospitals from reduced transfers and keeping patients closer to their homes.

  • 4.

    Standardized practice evolution: We agree that the benefits associated with standardizing care can be difficult to achieve. The sharing and benchmarking of data and the reporting solutions that are part of larger programs have provided powerful tools for encouraging the adoption of standard best practices and measuring the impact of these changes on critical care outcomes.

We also agree that studies using the best available analytics tools to make meaningful comparisons of alternative ICU telemedicine approaches and practices are important.

References

Hawkins H.A. .Lilly C.M. .Kaster D.A. .Kaster D.A. .Groves R.H. Jr..Khurana H. . ICU telemedicine comanagement methods and length of stay. Chest. 2016;150:314-319 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .McLaughlin J.M. .Zhao H. .et al A multicenter study of ICU telemedicine reengineering of adult critical care. Chest. 2014;145:500-507 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Zawada E.T. Jr..Herr P. .Larson D. .Fromm R. .Kapaska D. .Erickson D. . Impact of an intensive care unit telemedicine program on a rural health care system. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:160-170 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Irwin R.S. .Flaherty H.M. .French C.T. .et al Interdisciplinary collaboration: the slogan that must be achieved for models of delivering critical care to be successful. Chest. 2012;142:1611-1619 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .Zuckerman I.H. .Badawi O. .Riker R.R. . Benchmark data from more than 240,000 adults that reflect the current practice of critical care in the United States. Chest. 2011;140:1232-1242 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .Cody S. .Zhao H. .et al Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA. 2011;305:2175-2183 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 

Figures

Tables

References

Hawkins H.A. .Lilly C.M. .Kaster D.A. .Kaster D.A. .Groves R.H. Jr..Khurana H. . ICU telemedicine comanagement methods and length of stay. Chest. 2016;150:314-319 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .McLaughlin J.M. .Zhao H. .et al A multicenter study of ICU telemedicine reengineering of adult critical care. Chest. 2014;145:500-507 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Zawada E.T. Jr..Herr P. .Larson D. .Fromm R. .Kapaska D. .Erickson D. . Impact of an intensive care unit telemedicine program on a rural health care system. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:160-170 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Irwin R.S. .Flaherty H.M. .French C.T. .et al Interdisciplinary collaboration: the slogan that must be achieved for models of delivering critical care to be successful. Chest. 2012;142:1611-1619 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .Zuckerman I.H. .Badawi O. .Riker R.R. . Benchmark data from more than 240,000 adults that reflect the current practice of critical care in the United States. Chest. 2011;140:1232-1242 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
Lilly C.M. .Cody S. .Zhao H. .et al Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA. 2011;305:2175-2183 [PubMed]journal. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Find Similar Articles
  • CHEST Journal
    Print ISSN: 0012-3692
    Online ISSN: 1931-3543